Before this site, I'd read a thriller and say yeah that worked or no that didn't work. Maybe, by osmosis, I'd be able to apply what the author had done well to my own work.
Since we've been doing these reviews, though, I've had to figure out WHY I think a script works. A process which has led to the following list of suspense creating techniques for the thriller genre:
1. Imaginary information (showing alternate versions of the truth)
2. Necessary information (giving a character something that needs doing and allowing him/her not to do it)
3. Distracting information (at a critical moment, reversing the trajectory of a scene by way of a scream, gunshot, etc)
4. Random information (I called this the lucky break or the bad break)
5. Withholding information (a character says the equivalent of ‘this changes everything, and then doesn’t tell you how)
6. Camouflaged information (taking a familiar object and calling it by a more complex name)
7. Highlighted information (taking an ordinary object, or action and drawing excessive attention to it)
8. Crowding information (making one thread in your story easy to figure out so that another, more important, thread is missed)
9. Glazing information (Think of your character like a dressed-up dish. You, the cook, coat them with all sorts of traits which is their representation of what they are to the world. If the “glaze” hides what they really are and yet is CONSISTENT with what they really are, you’ve pulled this technique off.)
10. Impossible information (presenting sensorial evidence to a character in your story which is flatly contradicted by what the character knows to be the truth)
I'm thinking that by pulling (with as much variety as possible) from this list as you design your plot points, you can't fail to create suspense.
I was wondering if this idea strikes you writers as plausible, and if there is anything you know of that could be added to the list. I've been adding to is as I come across something new in a review.


Reply With Quote



